Debt Camel

Answers to questions about debts and credit ratings - in plain English!

  • Home
  • Debt refunds ▾
    • Overdraft refunds
    • Catalogues & credit cards
    • Large loans
    • Car finance – affordabilty
  • Debt solutions ▾
    • Payment arrangements
    • Debt Management Plans
    • DRO – Debt Relief Order
    • IVAs
    • Bankruptcy
    • Compare 2 solutions
    • Help if you can’t pay bills & debts
  • Car commission
  • Latest posts
  • About ▾
    • About Debt Camel
    • Media

2018 FOS statistics – most complaints about QuickQuid

New statistics for July-December 2018 from the Financial Ombudsman (FOS) show how payday loan complaints have jumped in the second half of 2018 and give details for how many complaints the larger lenders had.

Almost all these cases are affordability complaints where a customer was given payday loans without proper affordability checks and is asking for a refund of interest paid.

The Ombudsman Annual Review in May 2019 said that payday loan complaints had gone up by 130% to about 40,000 in 2018-19.

QuickQuid – the most complained about lender in 2018

January – June 2018 statistics

In FOS figures for the first half of 2018:

  • complaint numbers for QuickQuid have tripled since the last half of 2017
  • Wonga’s complaints nearly doubled, forcing it to go into administration at the end of August
  • other payday lenders such as Lending Stream, Sunny and Payday UK have also seen numbers of Ombudsman cases more than double in the last half year.

QuickQuid had the most complaints of any banking and credit firm (excluding PPI complaints which are treated as insurance complaints):

This jump has taken QuickQuid to be the most complained about banking and credit firm in Britain in 2018. Barclays had the next largest number of complaints and then Wonga.

This contrasts to the last half of 2017, when the big banks took the first five places, with Wonga coming in sixth and QuickQuid eighth.

Here are the worst firms for complaints, showing how the numbers of banking and credit complaints to the Ombudsman (this excludes PPI) have changed from the last half of 2017 to the first half of 2018:

Jul-Dec 17 Jan-Jun 18
QuickQuid 1509 4692
Barclays 4710 4633
Wonga 2347 4520

July – December 2018 statistics

The new FOS data shows that in the last six months of 2018, QuickQuid’s complaint numbers rose even further to 5,717.

So during 2018 FOS was sent more than 10,000 complaints about QuickQuid.

And it was still at the top of the lender complaints table. Second and third were TSB – unsurprisingly after all their IT problems – and Barclays.

Then came more payday lenders.

The Payday UK/Payday Express/Money Shop group had 3,736 complaints, and Lending Stream with 3,702.

Wonga is no longer high in the table for the second half of 2018 as no complaints were accepted by FOS  after it went into administration at the end of August.

Payday loan complaints are often being upheld

Today’s statistics show that the Financial Ombudsman is upholding a slightly smaller percentage of payday loan complaints than previously:

  • QuickQuid’s uphold rate has dropped from 69% in the first half to 58%.
  • Sunny’s has gone down slightly to 63% and Lending Stream’s to 60%.

I don’t think that FOS has got stricter. Nor do I think the payday lenders are settling good complaints directly with the customer.

I think these small falls are because in 2018 Claims Management Companies started sending some very weak complaints, some for only one loan, to FOS.  It is these very weak cases that have brought the success rates for customers down. They may well continue to drop in 2019 for this reason.

These are still very high uphold rates – higher than for most other types of product the Ombudsman covers.

Payday lenders need to improve how they handle complaints

The current high levels of customer complaints being won at the Ombudsman suggest that the payday lenders have still not improved their complaints handling enough in the last year.

Lenders are continuing to reject or make poor offers to customers complaints even when they know similar cases are being upheld by the Ombudsman. This is not treating their customers fairly.

And some of these firms now have a large backlog of cases with FOS.

Lenders such as QuickQuid and Lending Stream need to reconsider the rejections or poor offers they made to some of their customers in the queue for FOS decisions. They should make new offers taking into account what they now know about FOS’s approach to handling loans over 6 years old, loans after 2015 and long chains of loans.


More Debt Camel articles:
QuickQuid goes into administration

QuickQuid is now in administration

Is a card or catalogue limit too high?

April 18, 2019 Author: Sara Williams Tagged With: FOS, High cost credit news/policy, Payday loans, QuickQuid

Comments

  1. Sara (Debt Camel) says

    April 26, 2019 at 2:38 pm

    If QQ accept they usually pay out within a week.

  2. Sara (Debt Camel) says

    May 1, 2019 at 8:17 am

    This letter from Asset Collections – was it about the QQ debt – which you had repaid – or a different debt? if a different debt, what debt was it?

    Is this your second loan from QQ? how large was the first one? What other payday lenders have you used? And what other balances do you owe at the moment – are there some you are paying? and some you are not paying?

  3. Sara (Debt Camel) says

    May 1, 2019 at 11:14 am

    You have to stop thinking that the solution to not being able to repay a creditor or a debt collector is to get another loan from someone else. Not just for this loan, but always in future. If you are chased by a creditor or a debt collector, make an arrangement to pay.

    You need to tell QQ that you cannot afford the repayments and ask for an affordable payment arrangement – this may well be £1 a month until you are back in work.

    QQ can’t continue to pile on the interest – there is a legal cap which says you can NEVER pay more interest and charges than the amount you borrowed for payday loans. If you did get a CU loan to repay this, you would be then paying CU interest (which isn’t low) on top of the QQ interest which you have repaid.

    I also think you should send QQ an affordability complaint. 2 loan cases aren’t easy, but here the second loan was for a lot more than the first and it sounds as though your credit record would have been very poor, so ask them to remove the interest on the balance so you just repay what you borrowed.

    • Matt says

      May 1, 2019 at 11:51 am

      Yeah that’s a good point , I have just found it hard to deal with but realise now that I should have just accepted assets management ccj instead of taking out further debt . If I am offered a loan by a credit union I will turn it down . Should I contact quick quid now and let them know .
      And in regards to the affordability complaint when should I contact them .

      Thanks again for your time
      My stress levels have gone down after hearing from you

      Matt

  4. Greg says

    May 23, 2019 at 11:19 am

    Any update Amy?

  5. Steven Mcdonough says

    August 21, 2019 at 12:03 am

    How long was it before your payout?

I post regularly on Instagram

Follow me!

Help with your debts

Recommended places for debt advice

Get an email after a new article:

About Debt Camel

This is the personal website of Sara Williams.

More about Debt Camel.
Privacy policy and Comments Policy
Contact (not for debt advice)

 

Copyright © Debt Camel 2025