Support for mortgage interest (SMI) provides help to people on benefits with part of the cost of paying a mortgage.
Most homeowners whose household finances have been affected by Coronavirus have taken mortgage payment breaks. This has avoided problems with mortgage arrears and people haven’t had to think about how they could get help with their mortgage costs.
But people could only get six months mortgage payment breaks because of coronavirus. And many people have already used up their six months, see When mortgage payment breaks end, can you pay your mortgage?
So problems with mortgages are going to be increasing from now on and then people begin to find how little help SMI provides.
What is SMI?
People paying rent can get some or all of it covered through Housing Benefit or Universal Credit. SMI can be seen as the equivalent help for people with mortgages.
This House of Common Briefing paper gives a timeline of the changes to SMI since 1988. It looks in detail at the changes made in 2018 when the previous SMI benefit was replaced by a loan.
Most of the new SMI claimants over the next year are likely to be working-age people whose self-employment income has decreased or who have lost their job and who have applied for Universal Credit.
The many problems with SMI
1) 9 month delay until SMI is paid
You have to have been claiming a relevant benefit for 39 weeks before you can get help with your mortgage costs.
In 2009, to help Britain cope with the recession after the 2008 financial crisis, the 39 week waiting time for SMI was reduced to 13 weeks.
In 2016 this was put back up to 39 weeks. The rationale for this seemed to be that with jobs again easier to find, most people could find a new job within nine months.
But now, after Coronavirus, the jobs market is expected to be very difficult for a long while. Many people don’t have enough redundancy pay, savings or insurance to get them through to this 39-week point, so by the time SMI starts being paid they may already have substantial mortgage arrears.
The Building Societies Association called in June 2020 for the waiting time to be cut:
In light of Covid-19 and the pressure on people’s incomes, we are calling for the waiting time to be reduced. Making this change now will help create an environment by providing a longer-term safety for homeowners. This will help people to able to stay in their homes, while dealing with financial pressures.
2) the “zero earnings” rule
You cannot get any help from SMI if you are on Universal Credit and you or your partner have any earnings at all.
The House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee recommended that this should be changed in 2012, saying:
Removing Support for Mortgage Interest as soon as any hours of work are undertaken could discourage some claimants from entering part-time employment… There is also the possibility of unintended higher spending consequences if claimants move to private rented accommodation, where assistance with housing costs will be given. We recommend that the Government looks again at this provision.
But the rule remains. So much for Universal Credit making work pay…
I can’t see any justification for this at all. If someone needs help with their rent, that doesn’t stop as soon as they earn £1, so why should help with paying a mortgage?
3) no help for mortgage amounts over 200,000
The limit of £200,000 for working-age claimants was set in 2009. At that time, the average mortgage on house purchases in 2008 was about £145,000 (ONS figures).
House prices and mortgages since then have risen considerably. The average mortgage on house purchases in 2019 was about £195,000.
That suggests that the £200,000 cap should be raised by about a third to provide the same level of help that was given in 2009.
4) payments that aren’t linked to mortgage costs
SMI only helps with the interest part of mortgage payments, not the repayment part.
The amount is assessed using a “standard rate” for mortgages, not the actual rate someone is paying. At the moment it is 2.61%
People who are fortunate to be on a very low mortgage fix can get more than it is costing them.
But many people are paying a lot more than 2.61%. The Standard Variable Rate in June 2020 was about 4.5%. People who can claim SMI – being on Universal Credit for 9 months without earning anything – will often have to pay the SVR as they will find it hard to get a good new rate when a fixed rate ends.
5) paying it as a loan – complicated & offputting
SMI always used to be given as a benefit. This was changed in 2018 to being paid as a secured loan.
The loan is on pretty friendly terms: interest is charged at “the gilt rate” so lower than a mortgage rate is (although I expect to see the SMI regulations changed rapidly if the gilt rate ever goes negative!); you don’t have to make any repayments until the house is sold; and it doesn’t show on your credit record.
However this is a major complication for people already in a difficult situation. And if they then get back to work and want to get back to normal, they will be saddled with a secured loan which can make it harder to remortgage at a good rate.
“Trying to pay as few people as little as possible”
My conclusion is that SMI has been designed to be as difficult as possible to claim and to pay out as little as possible.
The government needs to look urgently at reforming SMI so that it provides the help with mortgage costs that many people will need in the next year.
It will harm a future recovery if people are saddled with mortgage arrears. It will damage the housing market if people are forced to sell a house quickly. And no mortgage lenders want to see repossessions rise.
As a minimum I would suggest:
- drop the wait time back to 13 weeks;
- increase the cap to £250,000;
- remove the “zero earnings” rule;
- change the rate at which help is calculated to be more realistic.
Update: other people are now calling for major SMI changes, eg Centre For Policy Studies report: From SMI to Mortgage Support: How to help struggling homeowners through the pandemic.
But the government said in September 2020 that it was not considering decreasing the 39 week wait time.
Struggling to pay your mortgage?
Car finance breaks are ending
Should you take a SMI loan?
Chris Sykes says
I’d also like to add that as a debt adviser, I cannot give advice on SMI because it moves into “regulated financial advice”. I have to dance around the subject but can’t tell people if it is a good idea or not to claim SMI.
What regulated financial adviser wants to deal with people on low incomes and struggling with mortgage payments? None – because there is little profit in it for them.
So a system designed for us to not be able to comment on also.
Sara (Debt Camel) says
Yes, good point. And mortgage lenders don’t like it because they aren’t allowed to suggest someone takes a loan, whereas they could suggest that someom=ne claims a benefit.
There are other problems associated with it being a loan too, I guess I was just assuming that this was not going to be changed so I concentrated on other areas that were more likely to be refirmed.
Steve Mack says
I don’t think that advice can be offered, but we can explain it as an option and state, baldly, the facts of the scheme. It cannot be recommended, but it can be added to the inevitable list of possibilities.
Once the client chose the scheme, we could support them to apply.
Nick Pearson says
Excellent analysis as ever. Way back in 1981, I, along with various other debt advisers, put forward proposals for reform of support for mortgage borrowers. In short, they would borrow the full monthly mortgage payments (and any secured loans) from 1st day of claim. The would be no time limit on claim duration. The ‘loan’ would then be repaid from equity when the property was sold by the borrower in future or written off in full or in part if there was no equity. All Governments over the last 40 years have been reluctant to support homeowners – property is usually an appreciating asset & unlike Govt assistance with rent payments as the rented home is not an asset.
Lynn Crawford says
Brilliant as always Sara. Totally agree SMI is not suitable. The wait time is ridiculous and, like you say, if you do some work within the 9 months the clock starts again after the work stops. There is therefore no incentive to work.
Marie Watson says
Dear Sara
Are you aware of any changes to SMI standard variable rates from July 2020. My mother tells me she has received notice from DWP that, from July 2020, SMI will be calculated at 0.90%, dropping from 2.61%. Is this correct? If so, this huge decrease is scandalous considering how many people of working age are facing unemployment too. My mother receives PC Guarantee Credit and this drop will increase her mortgage by £140 per calendar month. I feel she was mis-sold this interest only mortgage in 2005 when she relied on her father’s inheritance which did not come into fruitition.
Sara (Debt Camel) says
Hi Marie, if your mum checks her letter, I think she will see that the rate that is dropping to 0.9% is the rate of interest the government charge on this loan. The 2.61% rate that they assess the amount of help she gets hasn’t changed. So this is good news for her, not bad :)
denise case says
After 2 years I’ve just received a new set of forms to complete for SMI loan, despite having completed these at the time of application. They are telling me that they ‘currently do not hold copies’ of those. They have been paying the interest to my mortgage provider but have never sent me a statement or acknowledgement of the loan themselves. I’m not sure how to proceed with these new forms. Also they want a witness signature of an outside person but we are under lockdown! Can you advise?
Sara (Debt Camel) says
I suggest you talk to your local Citizens Advice, this sounds very odd.
Richard says
It is scandalous that very obvious reforms to SMI have been outstanding for so long.
I would be very interested to know if currently there are any SMI support action groups for victims of this outrage, and whether any improvements are yet in the pipeline ?
Sara (Debt Camel) says
I don’t know of a support group.
I haven’t heard that the DWP is considering any improvements.
Susan says
I have also been told forms have been sent to me the ones I have already filled out apparently and they are renagin on a 875pound solicitors bill which was incurred because of a fault on their part after telling me as it was their fault they will reimburse me but are ignoring my letter despite it being sent by recorded delivery what should I do
Sara (Debt Camel) says
I suggest you talk to your local Citizens Advice