This post was written based on statistics published in 2022. Since then, statistics have been complicated by the special measures during COVID that temporarily prevented many IVAs from failing.
Statistics published in early 2024 show:
- one in three (33%) IVAs that started between 2016 and 2018 failed
- of IVAs that started in 2022, 5.6% failed in the first year. This was about the same as the previous year.
- of IVAs that started in 2021, 14.4% failed in the first two years. This has got worse from the previous year.
We won’t know the final percentage of how many IVAs that started in 2021 onwards fail for several more years. The Insolvency Service says there are “preliminary indications of a decline in lifetime termination rates” down from the one in three failure rate. This should be clearer in 2025.
Government statistics show many IVAs do not complete. They fail, leaving the borrower back with their debts.
If you are thinking of starting an IVA, you need to know about these IVA failure rates.

Contents
How many IVAs fail?
The IVA Outcome Statistics show how many IVAs succeed – get to the end and complete properly, with any remaining debt being written off.
It is inevitable that a few IVAs will fail. In a five or six year contract, unexpected things can happen. That isn’t the fault of the IVA firm if at the start of the IVA it looked likely to go well – it’s just life.
But the recent trend is that a lot more IVAs are failing, some in the first few years, and that isn’t good. It should be very unusual for an IVA to fail in the first two years.
This is what the Insolvency Service says:
The [failure] rate of 32% for IVAs registered in 2016 was the highest since 2009. Because 38% of IVAs in 2016 and 60% of IVAs in 2017 remained ongoing as at 31 December 2021, these numbers are likely to increase further.
It also points out that:
Historically, lifetime termination rates have typically been approximately 5-6 percentage points higher than the rate after four years.
So the final failure rates for IVAs started in 2016 and 2017 are very likely to be more than a third.
Termination rates fell during the pandemic because emergency provisions allowed people to have much longer breaks. This has distorted the statistics – it will be longer before these IVAs finish and until then more will be failing now these emergency breaks have ended.
Why have failure rates been increasing?
1) An IVA was never suitable at the start
One reason for the high early failure rates is likely to be that too many people are being sold an IVA that is not the best debt solution for them. They should have had a Debt Relief Order or gone bankrupt instead.
The FCA is trying to tackle the problem of very poor “advice” by some firms but the FCA only regulates a part of this market – the Insolvency Service needs to take more urgent action to control mis-selling.
Stepchange – an IVA providerwho has fewer failures than most – made the following sensible suggestions:
the current review of insolvency practitioner rules (SIP 3.1) must result in a stronger requirement for individuals to have received appropriate advice before being referred.
Monitoring of large providers should also be increased, with efforts to encourage more robust action — including publishing termination rates by firm.
The Insolvency Service could also work with creditors, advice providers and agents to help them identify IVAs which should be flagged as high risk and not be approved.
I think firms’ failure rates are an essential piece of information. They should be published by the Insolvency Service. Why should customers have to choose blind, without knowing this, when they decide to apply for an IVA?
2) More low-value IVAs
Another is that there are now a lot more IVAs set up with low monthly payments. These IVAs are much more vulnerable if your hours are cut or your energy bill doubles:
- if you are paying £350 a month, there is room for your monthly payments to be reduced;
- if your payment is only £120, there is little room to cut it much, so your IVA is much more likely to fail.
Inflation is likely to make failure rates worse
The number of low-value IVAs is especially concerning in 2022 as inflation heads much higher. This will mean that many – possibly most – current IVAs will be under pressure this year.
This requires a radical rethink of IVAs. If someone has been doing their best and the only reason their IVA is in trouble is because their expenses have gone up much more than their wages, then their IVA should not fail. And it should not be extended for more years. Instead their IVA should be completed and the debts in the IVA should be written off.
This is possible at the moment, but it requires creditors to approve it in a vote. That needs to be changed so that it is the automatic option in this situation.
But if you are looking at an IVA at the moment, you can’t assume that this change will happen. You need to look vary hard at what you are being asked to pay a month and how affordable that will be if petrol goes on up and energy prices, set to jump in April 2022 also go up a lot more in October 2022.
How long do IVAs last?
Many IVAs go on for more than the five or six years the original IVA said. This can happen where there has been an agreed payment break. Or when someone hasn’t reported extra income such as overtime.
At the end of 2021, 5% of IVAs started in 2014 and 17% of IVAs started in 2015, had not yet finished.
This is what one Debt Camel reader said:
IVA’s were supposed to be a way of getting debt free, not keeping you in insolvency for as long as they can. After 75 months of paying for this and a further 3 already waiting for news of closure I am sick of the stress of it all.
That is a pretty common reaction. Many people feel their life is just on hold in an IVA, for year after year:
- they will find it impossible to get a mortgage or a remortgage;
- it may be very difficult to get a tenancy if they need to move, unless they have a guarantor;
- the longer their IVA goes on, the older their car, white goods and furniture gets.
So if you are trying to decide between an IVA vs a DMP, or an IVA vs bankruptcy, you can’t assume that an IVA will be over in five years – often it won’t!
Choose a firm with a low IVA failure rate
Your proposed IVA payment may sound affordable, and a lot less than the normal repayments to your debts. That doesn’t mean it will still be affordable in a couple of years time.
The high failure rates show that for too many people their IVA has turned into a disaster. When an IVA fails, you are left back with your debts. Very often most of your IVA payments have gone in fees and not reduced your debts much.
StepChange publishes its failure rates and they are much lower than average. So talk to StepChange about an IVA – if they don’t think it’s a good idea, it may well be that the advice from a different IVA firm is too optimistic and not in your best interest.



Gary says
I’ve just finished mine 5 years plus 1 the one year equity 6 in total …
Got to say it’s been the most restrictive 6 years of my life and it hasn’t finished yet as it’s still sat on public records no response from the my paractioner for completion certificate
My car is 17 years old and hammered costing me 1500 a year to maintain my IVA was set at 30 for car
My IVA utiiies was set 100 a month it’s just gone up to 248 so my IVA 150 money will now go on utilities
I am under no illusion that mine would have failed in this correct climate can’t pay wat u haven’t got
Nick Pearson says
IVA’s are probably the best solution for many debtors but the providers are, on the whole, totally unscrupulous fraudsters. It is a scandal that IVA providers have such light touch & ineffective regulation. The current regime is a charter for poor & negligent advice. The 5 typical year term of an IVA is only in place because it is the only way to repay high fees and a return to the creditor. The legislation sets no term for an IVA. It is one of the great regrets of my ‘career’ in debt advice that I couldn’t get my fee free IVA off the ground due to lack of funding. A fee free IVA would on average payments repay as much, if not more, to creditors over 2 years than a typical IVA over 5 years. I also advocated 25 years ago for CitA and AUK etc to set up their own IVA provider – fee free.
Gary says
Yeh mine was 6 years at 150 I think I was about 44k ..so paid back 9k ish
Looking at my summary about half gone to practioncer Inc of the 1500 referer fee
If like to see more flexibility in the 10% uplift especially for those like me on minimum wage with four children I avoided doing overtime as it was pointless I would like to think you could put the overtime in and repair the car or save a better one
You do s 12 hour shift extrs Nic plus tax then they want 50 cut yon end up with about 20 in your hand for a 12 hour shift
Sarah says
I’m 2.5 years in and already feel so suffocated.
Does anyone have any good news stories about an IVA ending on time with a timely completion cert?
Sara (Debt Camel) says
Oh yes, they happen. But those people then get on happily with their lives, they probably aren’t posting on here.
So your payments are at the moment manageable? What about come April, are a lot of your bills increasing then?
Sarah says
Thanks, glad to hear that, I live in hope I won’t get screwed over at the end. As I’ve used a for-profit company stupidly.
I’ve cancelled sky tv, which should offset most of the energy increase in April. I’ll have to see what happens in October and maybe have another juggle around with outgoings if necessary.
Thank you :)
Gary says
My last payment was 10th Feb 2022 and i was with mcanvridge Duffy who are supposed to be 1 of the more ethical so I’m hoping for a timely Completition
I would say one of the things to watch in the is make sure your default dates are recorded on your credit file as close to your IVA start date
I have had issues with Santander who defaulted me 6 months after and it’s took.me 6 months to get it corrected
So potentially 6 years IVA …and 3 months completion ..and then a load of emails to sort out any wrong default dates
7 years of restrictions potentially
During that time to hold things together ..if your as family and unit is hard when your kids are asking why they don’t get a holiday your car’s are bangers and now cost of living war I will bet those attrition rates go to 50 ,% tuff times ahead
Malcolm Hurlston says
Are insolvency practitioners professionals or not? If they are, the Insolvency Service should plan to publish failure rates by practitioner, rather than by firm. Then the customer would enjoy an even clearer choice.
Sara (Debt Camel) says
yes and no – a lot of IPs sell on their IVAs quite soon after they start. So their record may look great as none have failed by then!