
There are now two different types of car finance commission complaints, “discretionary commission” and “undisclosed commission”.
In January 2024, the FCA allowed car finance firms to “pause” their handling of discretionary commission complaints. Then in October, a major appeal court case covered a completely different reason for asking for a refund of car commission – it was not fully explained to you.
So in December 2024, the FCA extended the scope of its pause on complaint handling to cover this second type of complaint, which may apply to more customers.
Contents
The 2 types of commission claim
“Discretionary commission”
It was common for car finance lenders to allow a car dealer to set the interest rate on a car finance agreement within a range – they had “discretion” over what the rate was. The dealer would get more commission from the car finance lender the higher the interest rate was. So they had an incentive to set your rate as high as they thought you might accept.
In January 2024, the Financial Ombudsman (FOS) awarded refunds in some key car finance cases. The FOS decisions were that discretionary commission was unfair and the customer should get a refund of the additional interest paid over the lower limit. This FOS announcement has links to the decisions.
It is thought that about 40% of car finance may have involved discretionary commission, so the number of potential complaints is very large.
The FCA, therefore, introduced a pause in January, allowing car finance lenders longer to reply to complaints while the FCA reviewed the market and possible refund arrangements.
As the FCA had banned this form of commission at the end of January 2021, these claims all relate to finance that began before that date.
The FCA had intended to set out the next steps in these claims in 2024, but the timetable was extended to May 2025, with firms having to provide a final response to complaints where there was by December 2025. Because lenders have longer to reply to complaints, customers also have much longer before they need to send them to the Ombudsman.
“Undisclosed commission”
An Appeal Court case in October 2024 awarded refunds of “undisclosed commission” in three car finance cases. In one of these cases, the car paperwork did not mention any commission. In the other two, there was a statement in the paperwork that commission may be paid, but it was not explained how much. The judgment decided that this was not clear enough for the customers and ordered that the commission should be refunded in each case.
This decision was based on English common law, not the FCA’s rules. Refunding undisclosed commissions potentially covers almost all car sales that involve a commission payment from the finance company to the dealer/broker, including car leasing and finance taken after January 2021.
The FCA has now introduced a pause for this new type of commission complaint, with the same timetable as the discretionary commission – car finance providers do not have to provide final responses to undisclosed commission complaints until December 2025.
This pause applies to a much wider range of car finance than the original DCA, including leasing and recent car finance.
Legal challenges
There was a legal challenge called a Judicial Review to one of the Ombudsman’s January 2024 discretionary commission decisions. If the court had ruled the decision was incorrect, the discretionary commission claims would have had to be reconsidered.
This has now been heard, and the judgment in December did NOT overturn the FOS decision. This is good news for customers with discretionary commission complaints. Barclays had said it would appeal this, but in September 2025 it announced it had withdrawn the Appeal, so the FOS decision stands.
The Appeal Court’s undisclosed commission judgment was appealed to the Supreme Court. The hearing date was at the beginning of April. The judgment was published on 1 August 2025.
The FCA has summed up the implications of the Supreme Court judgment as:
While some motor finance customers won’t get compensation because in many cases commission payments were legal, the Court ruled that in certain circumstances the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful.
An FCA compensation scheme will be proposed
Now these two legal decisions are clear, the FCA can proceed with setting up a compensation scheme. It says:
It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It’s fair for their customers to be compensated. We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal.
‘Our aim is a compensation scheme that’s fair and easy to participate in, so there’s no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get.
‘It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.
Making a claim
MSE’s two claims generator tools
MSE now has two tools that generate complaints for two different sorts of claims. These tools are free to use. They both generate an email for you to send and provide the email address for your finance lender.
The first one is for discretionary commission (DCA). No one was told when they bought a car whether there was any discretionary commission paid, it isn’t in your car finance paperwork anywhere. The only way to find out if it was paid in your case is to ask. If discretionary commission was paid, the email starts a complaint about this.
The second one is for undisclosed commission. It asks if any commission was paid. If it was but it was not set out in full, the email starts a complaint about undisclosed commission.
Which claim should you make?
Sometimes you don’t have a choice. In the following situations, make a complaint about undisclosed commissions:
- the finance stated after January 2021. At that point discretionary commission stopped so there can’t have been any;
- the car was leased (also known as Personal Contract Hire). Here discretionary commission doesn’t apply;
- your lender has stated they never used discretionary commission – there is a list of these lenders in the MSE discretionary commission tool. If your lender is on this list, there is no point in asking them about it so ask about undisclosed commission instead;
- you have already asked your lender about discretionary commission and have been told it was not charged on your car finance.
If none of those apply to you, you could potentially be able to make both sorts of claim. But obviously you can’t get the same commission refunded twice!
So MSE suggests you first ask whether there was any discretionary commission, using that tool, and later ask about the undisclosed commission if you are told there is no discretionary commission. This seems the simplest approach.
This is not going to be fast but start now
The FCA pauses and the court cases coming up mean these claims are not going to be fast. It is very unlikely there will be any refunds before 2026.
But kick off your claim now, so you know more about what commission was paid on your car finance. This will leave you in the best place going forward.
Don’t use a claims firm
You don’t need a claims company to do this or a firm of solicitors. It is simple and free to do yourself with the MSE tools. A claims company will take a very large amount of any refund that you get.
It will not be quicker to do with a claims company or solicitors. They don’t have lists of who has valid claims, they will ask the lenders the same question that you can, and have to wait for a response like you do. Nor will you get more compensation that way.
If the FCA orders an “automatic refund scheme”, you will get paid witout having to do anything but you will still owe the claims form their high fee even though they have done nothing useful at all .
The pause on FCA complaint handling sounds long… but in practice using claims firms will not be quick either.
IMPORTANT could you also make an affordability complaint?
These undisclosed commission complaints are not the same as affordability complaints.
But if your car finance was very hard to pay from the beginning, it may have been “unaffordable”. You may have had to get behind with other debts or borrowed more in order to be able to pay the car finance.
Here you may be able to win an affordability complaint if your finance ended within the last 6 years. See Were you sold a car on unaffordable car finance? for details and how to make an affordability complaint.
If you win an affordability complaint you will get all the interest refunded. This is likely to be much more than you would get from a commission complaint.
This article was updated in September 2025



Dean says
Hi Sara, I did a complex complaint to Black horse on the 15/4/24 from one of your templates we haven’t heard anything back just monthly replies stating there looking into my claim, what do you think I should do next? Shall I forward my claim to the ombudsman now?
Many thanks
Dean
Sara (Debt Camel) says
April 24? or 25?
Dean says
It was april 2024
Dean says
I used one of your templates, to car finance over through blackhorse I’ve had a x2 car finance with ford and both have been paid off, over payments on interest.
I’m sort of stuck what to do next?
Please help 🙏
Sara (Debt Camel) says
affordability complaints? and BH have rejected them? what were the dates of the 2 finances, start date and end date?
Sara (Debt Camel) says
what sort of debt was this? why was it complex?
CJ says
From Blackhorse:
Temporary changes to complaint time limits for DCA and non-DCA complaints:
The complaint handling pause has been extended to 31 May 2026. This means they’ve paused the eight-week deadline to respond to certain complaints about motor commission and you won’t be able to ask the Financial Ombudsman Service to look at your complaint, until after the pause has ended.
You will have more time to refer complaints to the Financial Ombudsman when a final response is issued. Instead of the usual 6 months, you have until 29 July 2026, or 15 months from the date of the final response letter, whichever is later. The timelines will be confirmed in the final response letter we send you.
ads2003uk says
Have you seen or heard anything about the big shake-up relating to the claims?
Apparently the FCA have agreed that carmakers set to be made exempt from the claims.
That means the likes of Volkswagen, Stellantis, BMW and Toyota whom have there own in house finance teams will now be exempt.
I for one have confirmation from both Alphera (BMW) and Steliantis (Peugeot) that I was subjected to the descretionary commission – but now I’m going to lose out and have only my Barclays Partner Finance
Report is on cardealermagazine and search for “FCA agrees to climbdown”
Sara (Debt Camel) says
I think we need to wait and seen what the FCA says. there are a lot of vague words in that article, eg “As a result, it is expected that manufacturers’ in-house finance providers will not be expected to pay compensation to at least some customers who were mis-sold finance.”
At least some… that could mean a few or almost all. There is little point in me speculating.
ads2003uk says
**IF** FCA say that they won’t be part of the redress would that stop any claims via the FOS as they have admitted to their error.
Sara (Debt Camel) says
I think that will depend on the actual situation. There is simply no point in me guessing